United States v. Shapiro
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, District Judge.
To correct an alleged manifest injustice, the defendant, Michael Shapiro, has filed a motion under Rule 32(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 18 U.S.C.A. to vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction and permit him to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere for the reason that he alleges the plea of nolo contendere was made under a mistake or misapprehension of fact and without knowledge of the full consequences of his plea.
Upon the entry of the plea of nolo contendere the court found the defendant guilty as charged in Count Two of the indictment and entered…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Michael Shapiro, Alias Mike ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- United States v. Manuel R. SambroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Manuel R. SambroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971