Legal Opinion

Sperry & Co. v. Percival Milling Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1889No. 12064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Plaintiff and defendant are 1 oth corporations; and the action is to enjoin defendant from counterfeiting, etc., certain trade-marks, labels, etc., of plaintiff, and for damages. The court found certain facts upon which it rendered judgment for defendant; and plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The main contention of appellant is, that the conclusions of law reached by the court below were erroneous, and that, upon the findings of fact, the judgment should have been for plaintiff. •

From March, 1883, to the commencement of this action, February 4, 1886,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lockwood v. BostwickNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. BriegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Spieker v. LashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Block Light Co. v. Tappehorn, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1904
  4. Feder v. BrundoCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API