Legal Opinion

Feder v. Brundo

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided January 31, 1898Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.

The several questions submitted for decision in this case arise upon a motion, filed by plaintiffs, praying for the allowance of a temporary restraining order.

The petition of plaintiffs, among other things, avers, — and I limit my recitals now from the petition, to such matters as are immediately pertinent to the question to be decided — the petition avers that Emanuel Feder and Marcus Feder, partners doing business as Feder Brothers, are engaged in the business of manufacturing cigars in the city of Cleveland, and, in connection with such business, conduct a factory for the manufacture of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caswell v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Hier v. . AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Connell v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. . TroxellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Robertson v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API