Legal Opinion

Janet M. Hicks v. Richard D. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 31, 2005No. 03-13686PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Chief Judge:

This civil action for damages is, among other things, about a county jail’s practice of strip searching all detainees who were to be placed in the general jail population — regardless of whether reasonable suspicion existed for the search of a particular pretrial detainee. Because we are overcome by this Circuit’s precedent, we must agree with the district court that such a general practice, for now at least,,is an unlawful basis for the searches. But because the Plaintiffs strip search in this case was supported by reasonable suspicion, we conclude that Defendants are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Terri Vinyard v. Steve WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Mann v. Taser International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Archuleta v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. James P. Crocker v. Deputy Sheriff Steven Eric BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Quebell P. Parker v. Scrap Metal Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Gish Ex Rel. Estate of Gish v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API