Legal Opinion
Archuleta v. Wagner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2008No. 07-1108PublishedCited by 269 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant D.L. Mandelko appeals from the district court’s order deny*1281ing her qualified immunity. In this civil-rights action, Plaintiff-Appellee Mercedes Archuleta alleged in pertinent part that Deputy Mandelko violated her Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by strip searching her. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Ms. Archuleta was strip searched pursuant to an incorrect arrest warrant. We have jurisdiction because the district court’s order rejecting Deputy Mandelko’s assertion of a qualified-immunity defense on a motion to dismiss is a “final decision” under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by269 opinions
- Thomas v. KavenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Hinkle v. Beckham County Board of CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.