Legal Opinion

Sioux Falls Argus Leader v. Miller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] The Sioux Falls Argus Leader and other members of the media (Media) 1 seek a writ of prohibition alleging that Circuit Court Judge Ronald K. Miller exceeded his authority in entering a pretrial participant gag order in the matter of State v. Layne and Wagaman, CR 99-144. The order, inter alia, prohibits trial participants from publicly discussing the case. Media claims this order violates its First Amendment right of freedom of the press. We granted an alternative writ, ordering the State and Judge Miller to show cause why the writ should not be made permanent. We now hold the…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Breck v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. WeaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Gray v. GienappSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API