Legal Opinion

Ghingher v. Thomsen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 7, 1933No. [No. 23, October Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boxd, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of the Court.

In the present case the Union Trust Company, one of the banking institutions held in custody and control under the Emergency Banking Act, chapter 46 of the Acts of 1933, holds, as trustee under a mortgage or indenture of trust to secure an issue of bonds, of the Potomac Mortgage Company, a fund paid in by that company to meet interest coupons shortly to fall due; and these bondholders and the company itself claim a right to have the amount set apart and applied on the coupons notwithstanding the provisions of the Emergency Banking Act. They…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Englar v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  2. County Commissioners v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Drovers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. RollerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Real Estate Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Italian Fruit & Importing Co. v. Penniman & CarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ghingher v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Ghingher v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Ghingher v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API