Legal Opinion

Black v. Vaughan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1888No. 2509PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Grimes. Tried below before the Hon. Norman G. Kittrell.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

Vaughn, who held a claim against Albert Arrington, brought suit upon it and had an attachment levied upon a stock of cattle to which Black laid claim, in accordance with our statute for trial of the right of property. The cause was submitted to the district judge, who filed his conclusions of law and fact, and rendered judgment thereon for the appellee, subjecting the property to the attachment. The claimant appealed to this court. There is no statement of facts; hence the judge’s conclusions of fact must be accepted as a correct statement of the result of the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. A. S. Valentine & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Wells v. LittlefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Greenleve, Block & Co. v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. W. D. Smith & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Brumley Estate v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Panhandle National Bank v. EmeryTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sanger Bros. v. ColbertTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Stevens v. CobernTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. M. Rosenheim & Son v. Flanders SistersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API