Legal Opinion

Romanoff Equities, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 20, 2014No. 11-374LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Summary Judgment; Rails to Trails; Scope of Easement; Abandonment; New York Law

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge

This “Rails-to-Trails” case deals with the creation of the “Highline” recreational trail in the City of New-York (“New York City” or “the City”). Plaintiff Romanoff Equities, Inc. (“Romanoff Equities”) claims that the United States (“the government”) took its property interest in the elevated railroad right-of-way that is now part of the Highline when the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”), a federal agency, authorized the City to turn the right-of-way into an elevated park. This court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  5. Lewis v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SHERMAN v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  2. Stimson Lumber Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Zanzarella v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API