Legal Opinion

Pacific Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Burnett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1924No. 4 Div. 149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The action was detinue to recover a Marmon automobile. The complaint as amended described the property claimed as one Marmon 1918 model touring car, now numbered 7181880, motor now numbered 92888. Upon filing original complaint the sheriff did not take the property in possession, for the reason stated in his return that he was unable to locate the property because of the indefiniteness of its description in the complaint. An alias writ was issued, and defendant gave the statutory bond and retained the possession of the ear. The trial, on plea of the general issue, resulted in a verdict for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Ex parte DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Wells v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Scott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Grace v. Old Dominion Garment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Ex Parte GraceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API