Legal Opinion

Amkraut v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1964PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Judgment appealed from affirmed, without costs to either party. Subdivision 3 of section 75 of the Civil Service Law, insofar as pertinent, provides “ [p] ending the hearing and determination of charges of incompetency or misconduct, the officer or employee against whom such charges have been preferred may be suspended without pay for a period not exceeding thirty days.” The statute thereafter provides for possible penalties.

¡Respondent Amkraut was suspended from his position March 2,1961, at which time charges were filed against him. Hearings on the charges were held from time to time, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phinn v. KrossNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Paris v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
  3. Carville v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gerber v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. MATTER OF SINICROPI v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Yeampierre v. GutmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Yeampierre v. GutmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API