Legal Opinion
NAR, S.P.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 27, 1989No. 86-12-01638PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, NAR, S.p.A. (NAR), has moved for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court. It challenges the findings of the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce (Commerce) in the third administrative review of an antidumping duty order covering certain plastic tape from Italy. Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy; Final Re-suits of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 51 Fed.Reg. 43,955 (Dec. 5, 1986). The contested review, covering NAR’s entries from July 1,1979 to September 30, 1984,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Melamine Chemicals, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Consumer Products Division, Scm Corporation, the United States, Party-In-Interest v. Silver Reed America, Inc. And Silver Seiko, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Monsanto Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Federal Mogul Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- N.A.R., S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Magnesuim Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.