Legal Opinion

Youmans v. Riley Properties

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 2, 1986No. 72843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Chief Judge.

This appeal is by the defendant in a dispossessory action from the denial of his motion for new trial: The sole enumeration of error is that the trial court was required to grant the motion because the named plaintiff did not purport to be a legal entity. Held:

“Where a party desires to raise an issue as to the capacity or authority of a party to bring an action, he must do so by specific negative averment in his responsive pleadings . . . Otherwise, such defense[ ] [is] deemed waived.” Klorer-Willhardt, Inc. v. Martz, 166 Ga. App. 446, 447 (304 SE2d 442) (1983). See also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Block v. Voyager Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Klorer-Willhardt, Inc. v. MartzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keeley v. Cardiovascular Surgical Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Memar v. StybloCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Martin v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Wilson v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API