Legal Opinion
Eua Cogenex Corp. v. North Rockland Central School District
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 20, 2000No. 99 Civ. 2372(CM)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McMAHON, District Judge.
EUA Cogenex (“EUA”) asserts three causes of action against the North Rock-land Central School District (“the District”) arising from the District’s failure to pay EUA under an energy savings performance contract: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (3) unjust enrichment. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on those claims. Defendant cross moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims of breach of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kermanshah v. KermanshahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Net2Globe Intern., Inc. v. Time Warner Telecom of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Digizip.com, Inc. v. Verizon Services Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Pratt ex rel. Petranchuk v. Indian River Cent. Sch. Dist.District Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Flaherty v. MASSAPEQUA PUBLIC SCHOOLSDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.