Lessard v. Samuel Sherman Corporation
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.
This action of assumpsit was tried before a jury in the Superior Court in the County of Kennebec. The jury found for the plaintiff for $4,624.66 which was within about $250 of the balance claimed to be due on an account for work and labor performed, materials furnished, and equipment used by the plaintiff for the defendant at its request. The case is before us on the defendant’s general motion for a new trial.
The case has been argued with great care and forcefulness by both sides and we have before us a record of more than two hundred fifty pages and numerous exhibits. Because of these facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hill v. FinnemoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Harvey v. DonnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
- Inhabitants of Enfield v. BuswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- McMann v. Reliable Furniture Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Bragdon v. ShapiroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Fossett v. DurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Witham v. QuiggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Gregory v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.