Legal Opinion

Peterson v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1976No. 75-253-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

This case requires setting forth the respective responsibilities of trial counsel and the trial court in establishing an adequate transcript of the proceedings at the time of trial.

Those responsibilities, and the procedure to be followed, are set forth for this state in sec. 274.117, Stats. That statute provides:

“274.117 Approval of transcript. Any party may procure a transcript of the reporter’s notes. ... A copy of the transcript shall be served on each adverse party who has appeared. . . . Within 20 days after service, any -party may serve proposed amendments upon all other parties. If no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roney v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Stelloh v. LibanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Miller v. BelangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Borgrud v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Clark v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. State v. ProberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  5. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API