Legal Opinion

Stopka v. Lesser

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1980No. 79-41PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

Should the special injury requirement in malicious prosecution actions in Illinois continue to be the law in Illinois? That is the overriding issue raised in this appeal from the malicious prosecution and legal malpractice action brought by plaintiff, Joseph L. Stopka (Stopka), against Norman H. Lesser (Lesser). Lesser filed a.motion to dismiss the suit for failure to state a cause of action. The principal issue before this court is whether Stopka has alleged sufficient facts to state a claim for relief.1

Lesser is a licensed attorney. One of his clients, James Luzzi (Luzzi), suffered an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lyddon v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Berlin v. NathanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Agricultural Transportation Ass'n v. CarpentierIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Doyle v. ShlenskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People v. ConnorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. McCutcheon v. MoranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Levin v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API