Legal Opinion

Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2011No. 20110142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] John and Lori Finstad appealed from a district court judgment which granted summary judgment in favor of Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc., n/k/a Southeast Water Users District, and its board members (collectively, “Water District”), and dismissed their complaint. We conclude the district court erred in applying the three-year statute of limitations of N.D.C.C. § 32-12.1-10 to the Finstads’ contract claims, and genuine issues of material fact existed to preclude summary judgment. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] The Finstads owned 80 acres…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Missouri Breaks, LLC v. BurnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kittleson v. Grynberg Petroleum CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Frith v. The Park District of the City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Lakeview Excavating, Inc. v. Dickey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API