Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] John and Lori Finstad appealed from a district court judgment which granted summary judgment in favor of Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc., n/k/a Southeast Water Users District, and its board members (collectively, “Water District”), and dismissed their complaint. We conclude the district court erred in applying the three-year statute of limitations of N.D.C.C. § 32-12.1-10 to the Finstads’ contract claims, and genuine issues of material fact existed to preclude summary judgment. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] The Finstads owned 80 acres…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Missouri Breaks, LLC v. BurnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kittleson v. Grynberg Petroleum CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Frith v. The Park District of the City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Lakeview Excavating, Inc. v. Dickey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.