Legal Opinion
Millison v. Wilzack
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 9, 1989No. 571, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.
This appeal presents squarely, for the first time, the question of which, if any, statute of limitations applies to an action of inverse condemnation. 1 We hold that the three year general statute of limitations prescribed by Maryland Courts and Jud.Proc.Code Ann. § 5-101 applies; consequently, we will affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for St. Mary’s County. While this renders it unnecessary that we decide whether appellant’s action was also barred by res judicata, we will address his claim that the court erred in refusing to permit him to amend his complaint.
This…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Nixon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Duke Street Ltd. P'ship v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS CALVERT CTY.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Arthur E. Selnick Associates, Inc. v. Howard County MarylandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.