Legal Opinion

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Shatto

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1989No. 88-1234PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant department appeals from the denial of its motion to change venue, arguing that an intervening opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Dep’t of Transp. v. Soldovere, 519 So.2d 616 (Fla.1988) (Soldovere II), entered after this court had previously per curiam affirmed an earlier order denying the department’s motion for change of venue, requires that the law of the case be altered and venue of the cause of action be placed in Leon County — the county where the department maintains its headquarters. We disagree and affirm.

When the trial court initially denied appellant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Brunner Enterprises v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Department of Transp. v. SoldovereSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Keith v. DykesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONS. SERV. v. SchickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API