Berger v. Lang

OPINION

SCHNEIDER, Chief Justice.

Sid Berger and John A. Reedy appeal from a judgment in which they were found to have converted property belonging to Danny Lang, Sr. and Danny Lang, Jr. (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Berger and Reedy complain that the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence of the confidential deliberations and findings of the State Bar Grievance Committee against Berger and (2) failing to apply the principles of res judicata. We affirm.

CONFIDENTIALITY

In point of error one, Berger and Reedy (collectively “Defendants”) complain the trial court erred in admitting evidence…