Legal Opinion
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 71-1202PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
This--is an action under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The named plaintiffs are two married, female, graduate students at the University of Pittsburgh. Procedurally they purport to represent, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all other persons similarly situated. Substantively they seek (1) to have declared unconstitutional and enjoined Rule B(2) 1 of the “Rules Governing The Determination Of Student Pennsylvania Resident Status”, a rule promulgated by the Auditor General of Pennsylvania, and (2) to have all the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Samuel J. Jordon v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.