Legal Opinion

Beckett v. State ex rel. Rothert

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1892No. 536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

This was a prosecution for bastardy. The record shows that a complaint in due form was filed before a justice of the peace, upon which a warrant was issued • for the arrest of the defendant. The warrant was returned “not found,” and the justice heard the complaint in the absence of the defendant, and decided that he was the father of the relatrix’s child, and certified the cause to the circuit court. There an affidavit was filed, showing that the defendant was a non-resident of the State, and an order was entered directing that notice be given of the pendency of the action by publication. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wiggins v. KeizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Lucas v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Moyer v. BucksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Patterson v. State ex rel. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neill v. RidnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Milosavljevic v. BrooksDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1972
  3. Fisher v. State, Ex Rel. MorrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Beckett v. State ex rel. RothertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API