Central Trust Co. of New York v. Sheffield & B. Coal, Iron & Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama
On Exceptions to the Master’s Report.' Suit by the Central Trust Company of New York against the Sheffield & Birmingham Coal, Iron & Railway Company, and others. Intervention of the Watt Mining Car-Wheel Company.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
The intervenor came into this court to have recognized and enforced a lion claimed on a certain coal mine, and on the machinery, equipment, and fixtures therein, especially on 240 coal-cars, all of which is in the custody of this court. Under a specific contract, the in-tervenor furnished to the owners of the mine cars specifically adapted for use in the mine; and for the furnishing and equipment thereof—
“It is agreed that said cars are now in use in said mine as a part of the equipment thereof, and are used to haul coal from where it is mined to the opening or month of the mine, upon an iron…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Witt v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Copeland v. Kehoe & RamseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Ex parte SchmidtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Taggard v. BuckmoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Black v. Elkhorn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Peaceable Creek Coal Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Des Moines City Railway v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.