Legal Opinion

Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboise

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1992No. 72037Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

597 N.E.2d 622 (1992)

149 Ill.2d 314

173 Ill.Dec. 648

DIX MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Roy Mitchell Estate, Appellee,

v.

Terrence LaFRAMBOISE, Appellant.

No. 72037.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

July 30, 1992.

John A. Beyer and Steven D. Ziegler, Satter, Beyer & Spires, Pontiac, for appellant. Monica E. Rackauskas, Mark E. Condon and Peter W. Schoonmaker, Condon & Cook, Chicago, for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · BilandicJustice Bilandic

Dix Mutual Insurance Company (insurance company) paid its insured (landlord) $40,579 for a fire loss on certain real property. The insurance company, by way of subrogation, seeks to recover the $40,579…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API