Fosdick v. Fosdick

This is a petition for divorce on the charge of extreme cruelty. The respondent makes three defences, namely: first, that the charge is not true ; second, that the petitioner was not, during the year before the preferring of her petition, a domiciled inhabitant of this State; and, third, that the parties have agreed to articles of separation which have been duly executed. The questions raised by the first two defences are questions of fact. We think it is enough to say of them that, in our opinion, both of them, on the evidence, must be decided in favor of the petitioner. The fact that the…