Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1942No. 11217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Rio Grande Valley Gas Company has appealed from a money judgment rendered ' in favor of P. S. Ford, the plaintiff below. The action was based upon Article 1438, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., which reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any such corporation [gas, electric current or power corporation] to discriminate against any person, corporation, firm, association or place, in the charge for such gas, electric current or power, or in the service rendered under similar and like circumstances.” The Article is a part of Subdivision 4, Chapter 10, of Title 32, Vernon’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Quality Laundry, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API