Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1964No. 6 Div. 989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment that appellant is the father of an illegitimate child. He was also ordered to pay six dollars to the mother each week for the infant’s support.

The sole question is what effect is to be given Act 295 of September 15, 1961, p. 2353,1 which enlarged the duties of adjudicated fathers and lengthened the time before limitation.

We have here the following timetable;

1. The child was born October 9, 1960.

2. The Governor signed Act No. 295 September 15, 1961.

3. October 9, 1961, period of limitations under Code 1940, T. 6, § 7, could 2 have run [but Act No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Kentucky Union Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. League v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. In Interest of WMVNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Moore v. LeFloreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API