Legal Opinion

RSR Corp. v. Commercial Metals, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 27, 2006No. 3:03cv013Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 5), TREATED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 56 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

Plaintiff RSR Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “RSR”) brings this litigation against De fendant Commercial Metals, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Commercial Metals”), in order to recover a portion of the expenses that it has incurred along with other potentially responsible parties to clean up the Arca-num Iron & Metal Superfund Site…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API