Legal Opinion
United States v. Graham
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 14, 2011No. 08-14736PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Riley Graham was indicted along with seventeen other people in a mortgage fraud case. 1 He was tried separately from his co-defendants because he insisted on proceeding pro se — at least until the very day his trial began. After a four-day trial, at which he was represented by counsel, a jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts, and he was convicted. His appeal was consolidated with his co-defendants’ appeals. See Fed. RApp. P. 3(b)(2). We are issuing this separate opinion in Graham’s case in order to address the three issues he has raised, which are distinct from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ronald Keith BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Floyd Brown, James Woodrow Mullis, Paul Wendell Calhoun, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Qadir ShabazzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Mark Willner, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Armando Antonio CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Carlson (In Re Carlson)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.