Commonwealth v. Goodman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
Herein, this court is asked to define the scope of the Attorney General’s authority to investigate criminal offenses. In Commonwealth v. Carsia, 341 Pa.Super. 232, 491 A.2d 237 (1985), argued eo die as the present appeal, we held that the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute criminal cases is limited to the specific instances set forth in Section 205(a)(1)-(8) of the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, Act of October 15, 1980, P.L. 950, No. 164, § 101 et seq., 71 P.S. § 732-205(a)(1)-(8).1
*407That holding was based on the court’s conclusion that the legislature intended the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- State v. HughesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Commonwealth v. McCauleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. O'KickiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.