Legal Opinion
Banks v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 16, 1969No. 670PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner did not ask the Supreme Court of California to review the judgment entered by the Court of Appeal in this case. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeal is not a “[fjinal judgment . . . rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had . . . 28 U. S. C. § 1257, and we lack jurisdiction to review it. The writ of certiorari is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
2Cited by10 opinions
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gerard Joseph Pugh v. Hugh SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Riddle v. KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In Re BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Albert L. Pierson v. Dave DormireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.