Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. Hines

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 13, 1922No. 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

1. Congress admittedly gave its consent that the United States might be sued in negligence for causes of action arising- from its control of the railroads, and by General Order No. 50 the duly appointed Director General lawfully required that such an action be instituted against him instead of against the railroad company, and it has been decided by the Supreme Court, in Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Ault, 256 U. S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 593, 65 L. Ed. 1087, that no liability was imposed upon railroad corporations for damages in actions for negligent operation in consequence of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1944
  2. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Warf v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
  4. Gilinsky Fruit Co. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API