Rosenzweig v. Hines
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
1. Congress admittedly gave its consent that the United States might be sued in negligence for causes of action arising- from its control of the railroads, and by General Order No. 50 the duly appointed Director General lawfully required that such an action be instituted against him instead of against the railroad company, and it has been decided by the Supreme Court, in Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Ault, 256 U. S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 593, 65 L. Ed. 1087, that no liability was imposed upon railroad corporations for damages in actions for negligent operation in consequence of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cunningham v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1944
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Warf v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Gilinsky Fruit Co. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929