Legal Opinion

Gilinsky Fruit Co. v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1929No. Docket No. 6475Published

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover damages to some shipments of green fruit. The defendant answered and a trial was had before the trial court sitting with a jury. The plaintiff introduced its proof and rested. Thereafter the defendant introduced his proof and rested. Later the plaintiff introduced proof in rebuttal and then it rested. Thereupon the defendant made a motion that the jury be directed to bring in a verdict in favor of the defendant. The motion was granted and a judgment based on that verdict was entered. In due time the plaintiff made a motion for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Davis v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Tutsch v. Director-General of RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Vassau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API