Semple v. Tri-City Drywall, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
This appeal presents a question that has not yet been decided in Arizona. In a review of an administrative decision by the Registrar of Contractors, may the trial court, pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-341.01(A), award to the prevailing party attorney’s fees incurred in the proceedings before the Registrar of Contractors? We hold that the statute does not provide for such an award and thus reverse that portion of the judgment awarding appellee Tri-City Drywall (“Tri-City”) its attorney’s fees incurred in the administrative proceedings.
I. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Stokes v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Continental BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. ConlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County RecorderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El DestinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.