Legal Opinion

People v. Willis

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2002No. S096349PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Under existing law, when either party in a criminal case succeeds in showing that the opposing party has improperly exercised peremptory challenges to exclude members of a cognizable group, the court must dismiss all the jurors thus far selected and quash the remaining venire. (People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258, 282 [148 Cal.Rptr. 890, 583 P.2d 748] (Wheeler); see Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 [106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69] (Batson).) Wheeler reasoned that the remedy of dismissal was appropriate because “the complaining party is entitled to a random draw from an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. SchmeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United States v. Charles W. Walker, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  5. People v. MuhammadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API