Legal Opinion

People v. Andujar

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided February 28, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lynn R. Kotler, J.

The defendant is charged with unlicensed general vending in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 20-453.

The defendant has moved in an omnibus motion for: (1) dismissal of the accusatory instrument for facial insufficiency; (2) discovery; (3) a bill of particulars; (4) preclusion of convictions and prior bad acts; (5) suppression of physical evidence; and (6) suppression of statement evidence.

For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted only to the extent that the accusatory instrument is dismissed for facial insufficiency.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. KohutNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. AndujarAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  2. People v. AndujarCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
  3. People v. Andujar (Jose)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API