Legal Opinion

Appeals of Durand v. Reynolds

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1965No. 7597PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

Applicants-appellees, successors to certain adjudicated water rights in the Nine-Mile Draw area of Chaves County, New Mexico, filed an application with the state engineer “TO SUPPLEMENT SURFACE WATER WITH SHALLOW GROUND WATER AND/OR TO CHANGE PARTIAL POINT OF DIVERSION FROM SURFACE TO SHALLOW GROUND WATER.” The source of applicants’ water right in the Nine-Mile Draw area is springs fed by seepage from a shallow ground water acquifer of the Roswell Artesian Basin, and flood waters in Nine-Mile Draw and Zuber Hollow composed of surface runoffs caused by precipitation. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Johnson v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Kelley v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Heine v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lion's Gate Water v. D'ANTONIONew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Tri-State Generation & Transmission. Ass'n. v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mathers v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Moongate Water Co., Inc. v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. S.I.C. Finance-Loans of Menaul, Inc. v. UptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API