Citizens' Fire Insurance v. Swartz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Second District. Court. ‘
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action is to recover the premium upon a policy of fire insurance issued by the plaintiff to the defendant, November 22, 1895, and having one year to run.
The parties agreed in the court below upon the following facts:
That the policy was the New York standard form (Laws 1886, chap. 488; Richards on Ins. [2d ed.] 584), containing the usual agency clause that “ Iii any matter relating to this insurance no person unless duly authorized in writing shall be deemed the agent of the company; ” that the insurance was negotiated between the parties by one J ames M. Lezynsky, an insurance broker, who…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilber v. Williamsburgh City Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Greenwich Insurance v. Union Dredging Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1887
- O'Brien v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central Surety & Insurance v. MarroNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Lesher, Whitman & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1926
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Robbins & Myers Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
- Manhattan Wet Wash Laundry Co. v. Guardian Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Robbins & Myers Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.