Legal Opinion

Mobley v. MANHEIN SERVICES CORP.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 1995No. 9212 08255; CA A81680PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment on his claim for breach of an employment contract. We affirm.

The following relevant facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff began work for General Electric Corporation as an auto body painter in 1988. At the time he was hired, his employer adopted and maintained a “Code of Conduct” booklet, which set out the terms and conditions of employment. The Code of Conduct contains, among other things, a declaration that the objective of any disciplinary action is to improve performance, and a provision that, upon receiving four disciplinary warnings, an employee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Simpson v. Western Graphics Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hussey v. HuntsingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Blackthorne v. PosnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  3. Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Brunick v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Anderson v. Public Employes Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API