Kray v. Petersen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.'
Action to declare a real estate mortgage given by defendants Freerk G. Petersen and wife to the other defendants, their children, void or subordinate to a judgment held by plaintiffs against Freerk G. Petersen. There were findings in favor of defendants, upon which judgment was entered, from which plaintiffs appeal.
The only proposition plaintiffs can raise upon'this appeal is that the evidence does not sustain the finding that the mortgage executed and duly recorded on May 22, 1934, by defendants Freerk G. Petersen and wife, upon certain real estate in Chippewa county, this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thysell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Underleak v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Watson v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Skinner v. OverendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Petersdorf v. MalzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.