Petersdorf v. Malz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Le Sueur county against Louis E. Malz, Henry Malz and Augusta Petersdorf to declare plaintiff’s judgment against defendant Louis E. Malz to be paramount to certain other judgments described in the complaint. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Olsen, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. Prom the order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Plaintiff was formerly the wife of defendant Louis E. Malz; she is the sister of defendant Augusta Petersdorf, and defendant Henry Malz is the father of defendant Louis. In the statement of the ease defendant Louis will be referred to as defendant, and defendant Augusta Petersdorf, as Augusta. This will avoid repetition of their names in full, and leave the facts and the case just as clear. Prom the time of their marriage and until the commencement of the action for divorce, presently to be mentioned, plaintiff resided with her husband, defendant Louis, on a farm either owned or leased by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mackellar v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Giddings v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Knower v. Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bannon v. BowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Berry v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Neubauer v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Thompson v. SchiekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Engenmoen v. LutroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Farmers Co-Operative Assn. of Bertha v. KotzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.