Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richardson v. Farrar

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 11, 1892Published

Application to the original jurisdiction of this court, to award a writ of peremptory mandamus against Hon. F. R. Farrar, judge, temporarily, by executive appointment, of the county court of Prince Edward county, commanding him as judge of the said court, or such judge as may now he the lawful judge of the said court, to set aside and annul a certain order made in the said court August 7th, 1891, whereby it dismissed the complaint of sundry citizens, twenty or more, and duly…

Read the full summary

Application to the original jurisdiction of this court, to award a writ of peremptory mandamus against Hon. F. R. Farrar, judge, temporarily, by executive appointment, of the county court of Prince Edward county, commanding him as judge of the said court, or such judge as may now he the lawful judge of the said court, to set aside and annul a certain order made in the said court August 7th, 1891, whereby it dismissed the complaint of sundry citizens, twenty or more, and duly qualified voters of the county of Prince Edward, Virginia, of a false return, gross fraud and other specified…

1DissentLacy, J.

(dissenting), said :

This is an application by the petitioners, George Richardson and others, to this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the county court- of Prince Edward to hear and decide a contested election case, under section 106 of the Code of Virginia. That section provides: “ Sec. 160. The returns of elections of county, corporation and district officers shall be subject to the inquiry, determination, and judgment of the court of the county or corporation wherein the election was held, upon the complaint of fifteen or more qualified voters of such county, corporation,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  4. Ex Parte NewmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Ex Parte BradstreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API