Legal Opinion

Katschor v. Eason Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1936No. 25653PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Logan county by plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error, Eason Oil Company, and one D. G. Hughes. Hughes is not a party to this appeal and his interest, if any, is not ques-' tioned here. The action involves the rights and interests of the parties under a certain oil and gas lease covering lands in said county and the oil, casinghead gas, and gasoline produced and recovered pursuant thereto.

The plaintiffs in error Henry G. Katschor and Carl Katschor will be referred to herein as the landowners or the lessors; the other plaintiffs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connelly v. GaffaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howell v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Johnson v. JerniganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Ferguson v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Bosworth v. Eason Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Harding v. CameronDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API