Legal Opinion
People v. Daniel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: When this appeal was previously before this Court, we reserved decision and remitted the matter for a reconstruction hearing to determine whether Sandoval and/or Ventimiglia hearings were held and, if so, whether defendant was present (People v Daniel, 203 AD2d 968). The record of the reconstruction hearing establishes that no Sandoval hearing was required because the prosecutor agreed before trial not to question defendant concerning his conviction for driving while ability impaired (Vehicle and Trafile Law § 1192 [1]), and defendant had no other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. Di RaffaeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SaxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. WoodrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. MuscoreilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994