People v. Muscoreil

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to suppress items seized by the police and his statements to the police as the fruits of illegal searches of his hotel room, rental car and luggage. The record supports the court’s conclusions that defendant voluntarily consented to the officers’ entry into the hotel room (see, People v Murphy, 55 NY2d 819; People v Brown, 115 AD2d 791, 792-793, lv denied 67 NY2d 880) and that the seizure of the marihuana and drug paraphernalia in plain view in the hotel room was…