Succession of Homan
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
The residuary legatee, under the decedent’s last will and testament in nuncupative form by public act, dated March 9, 1938, filed suit against two particular legatees and the executrix of the estate, praying that the olographic codicils thereto, dated March 13, 1939, and May 27, 1939, be declared null and void and of no effect because they were not executed in the same form in which the will was made; and, in the alternative, that the double particular legacies to the same two legatees of twenty shares and thirty shares of homestead stock, respectively, be declared…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robouam's Heirs v. Robouam'sSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838
- Succession of StallingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Dimitry v. Shreveport Mut. Bldg. Ass'n.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Succession of BerdonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Succession of MercerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Succession of MulqueenySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Menard v. MuhsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Succession of BerdonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- In re the Succession of ReevesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Succession of RollingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.