Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Woodward

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This was a proceeding by notice of motion by S. M.. Woodward against W. P. Thurston, W. E. Morton and J. C. Byars to recover $990.00 for the rent of an office on south Tenth street, Richmond, Virginia. There was^a verdict and judgment for Woodward against all the defendants, and Thurston and Morton assign error.

Several of the errors alleged in the petition are, under the decisions of this court, insufficiently assigned. A. & D. R. Co. v. Reiger, 95 Va. 418, 28 S. E. 590; N. & W. Ry. Co. v. Perrow, 101 Va. 345, 43 S. E. 614; Bank v. Trigg Co., 106 Va. 327, 56 S. E. 158; Amusement Co. v. Pine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. First National Bank v. William R. Trigg Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  3. Atlantic & Danville Railway Co. v. ReigerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  4. Orr v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  5. Puckett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ballard v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. Forest Lakes Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. United Land Corp. of Am.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  3. Smith v. PayneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Denis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. Ennis v. Town of HerndonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API