Zimmermann v. Jourgensen
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Jacob A. Zimmermann and Joseph J. Zimmermann against Christian Jourgensen to recover a balance alleged to be due on a building contract. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
This action was brought to recover an alleged balance due to the plaintiffs upon a contract for altering defendant’s building 96 and 98 Maiden lane, under a written contract entered into between the parties. The referee found that on the 21st of March, 1890, the defendant entered into a contract with the plaintiffs whereby the plaintiffs agreed to malee certain alterations in the defendant’s building according to drawings and specifications made by one George A. Schellinger, an architect, and also to provide the materials for the completion of said work; for which the defendant promised and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Edward E. Buhler Co. v. New York Dock Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Aigeltinger Co. v. Healy-Tibbitts Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Riley v. KenneyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1900
- Bayfield County v. OgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920