Legal Opinion
Marsden v. Puck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 17, 1944No. Nos. 33,605, 33,613PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Streissguth, Justice.. In this contest involving the last will of Jane Marsden, dated May 6, 1940, and an instrument revoking all her wills, dated March 8, 1941, a jury answered four special interrogatories submitted to it as follows:
“Question No. 1: Was the testatrix, Jane Marsden, of sound and disposing mind and memory at the time of the execution of the will, dated May 6, 1940?
“Answer: Yes.
“Question No. 2: Was the execution of said will procured by undue influence?
“Answer: Yes.
“Question No. 3: Was Jane Marsden of sound and disposing mind and memory at the time of the execution of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- In re the Probate of the Will of NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- In Re Estate of HollisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Estate of MarsdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Brusven v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944